Endurance
Training and racing for running, cycling and triathlon: intensity zones, heart-rate math, how to split easy and hard work, pacing and race prediction, race-day fueling, heat and altitude, and injury risk. The physiology behind thresholds and fuel is in energy systems, everyday eating in nutrition and hydration, lifting in strength training, load progression and tapering in training plans, and warm-ups in running warm-up and drills.
Intensity zones
Two thresholds anchor every zone system: LT1 (first lactate rise, ≈ 1–2 mmol/L) and LT2 (second, steeper rise, ≈ 2.5–4 mmol/L). The 3-zone model splits at those two points; the Norwegian 5-zone scale subdivides it.
| 5-zone (Olympiatoppen) | % HRmax | Lactate (mmol/L) | RPE CR-10 (Borg 6–20) | Talk test | 3-zone |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I-1 very light | 55–72 | under 1.5 | 1–2 | speak effortlessly | Z1, below LT1 |
| I-2 fairly light | 72–82 | ≈ 1.0–2.0 | 2–3 | longer sentences, fairly easily | Z1, up to LT1 |
| I-3 somewhat hard | 82–87 | ≈ 1.5–3.5 | 4–5 (13–14) | short sentences | Z2, LT1 to LT2 |
| I-4 hard | 87–92 | not listed | 6–7 (15–16) | a few words | Z3, above LT2 |
| I-5 very hard | 92 and up | not listed | 8–10 (17–20) | one or two words | Z3 |
Zone values from the Olympiatoppen I-scale; lactate ranges are mean ± 1 SD in 160 elite runners and cyclists, so use your own tested values where you have them.
| Caveat | Detail | Source |
|---|---|---|
| %HRmax at the thresholds varies | elite: LT1 ≈ 80% and LT2 ≈ 88% of HRmax; a beginner's LT2 may be only 75–80% HRmax | Seiler-Viken et al. 2025 |
| talk test and RPE | equivocal talking and RPE 10–11 (Borg) mark VT1; unable to talk comfortably and RPE 13–15 mark VT2 | Bok et al. 2022 |
| lactate above I-3 | measurement noise and between-person variation make it a poor guide | Olympiatoppen |
| "zone 2" | in a 5-zone system it is easy aerobic running (I-2), not the 3-zone Z2 (threshold) |
ACSM intensity classes (health and fitness)
| Class | % HRR | % HRmax | RPE (6–20) |
|---|---|---|---|
| very light | under 30 | under 57 | under 9 |
| light | 30–39 | 57–63 | 9–11 |
| moderate | 40–59 | 64–76 | 12–13 |
| vigorous | 60–89 | 77–95 | 14–17 |
| near-maximal to maximal | 90 and up | 96 and up | 18 and up |
From Garber et al. 2011 (ACSM position stand). Its weekly guideline is 150 min moderate or 75 min vigorous exercise, or a mix.
Heart rate: HRmax and Karvonen
| Formula | Equation | Notes | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tanaka | meta-analysis of 18 712 people, checked in 514 lab tests; same for men and women | Tanaka et al. 2001 | |
| "220 − age" | underestimates HRmax in older adults | Tanaka et al. 2001 | |
| HUNT | 3 320 healthy Norwegians; SEE 10.8 bpm | Nes et al. 2013 |
- Any age formula is off by about ± 11 bpm for one person in three (SEE ≈ 10.8 bpm). Two 40-year-olds can differ by 20+ bpm.
- A measured HRmax is better; ACSM recommends direct measurement when feasible (Garber et al. 2011). A common field method is the highest reading in a hard 3–5 min uphill effort after a full warm-up, or at a 5 k finish.
- HRmax is not changed by training status or sex; it falls about 0.7 bpm per year of age (Tanaka et al. 2001).
Karvonen (heart-rate reserve) method:
with the fraction of reserve (0.6 for 60% HRR). Measure resting HR on waking, lying down, over several days. Karvonen allows for a low resting HR, so it suits trained people better than plain %HRmax.
Intensity distribution
| Model | Split (by sessions or time) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| polarised | ≈ 80% Z1, little Z2, ≈ 20% Z3 | the pattern Seiler found in elite rowers, skiers, runners and cyclists |
| pyramidal | most Z1, less Z2, least Z3 | common in distance runners; threshold work in the middle |
| threshold-heavy | much Z2 | "moderate every day"; the gray-zone trap |
| Evidence | Detail | Source |
|---|---|---|
| what elites do | about 80% of sessions at low intensity (≈ 2 mmol/L or less), about 20% hard, often intervals near 90% VO₂max | Seiler 2010 |
| more intensity for trained athletes? | intensification studies gave no convincing evidence of long-term gains | Seiler 2010 |
| polarised vs other distributions | VO₂peak improved a little more with polarised (SMD 0.24), only in short studies and highly trained athletes; time-trial performance and threshold speed or power were no different | Oliveira et al. 2024, 17 studies |
Practical rule: keep easy days truly easy (conversational, I-1 or I-2), make 1–2 sessions a week hard, and add threshold work (I-3) as the race gets longer.
Watch for Seiler's explanation of why most of the work should be easy and what "hard" days are for.
Key sessions and long runs
| Session | Zone | Typical dose | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| recovery run | I-1 | 20–40 min | blood flow, volume; nothing more |
| easy run | I-1 to I-2 | 30–75 min | aerobic base, most of the week's volume |
| long run or ride | I-1 to I-2 | the week's longest; runs typically 60 min to 2.5–3 h | fat use, glycogen storage, durability, practicing fueling |
| strides | fast but relaxed | 4–8 × 15–20 s, full recovery | form and speed without fatigue |
| threshold ("tempo", cruise intervals) | I-3 to I-4, ≈ 1 h race pace | 20–40 min total, e.g. 3 × 10 min, 2 min jog | raises LT2 |
| VO₂max intervals | I-4 to I-5, ≈ 3–5 k pace | 12–20 min total, 2–5 min reps, ≈ 1:1 rest | raises VO₂max |
| hill repeats | I-4 to I-5 | 6–10 × 60–90 s uphill, jog down | strength-speed, low impact |
| race-pace work | race pace | blocks inside a long run | pacing, fueling rehearsal |
Long runs and rides
- Keep each long run within about 10% of your longest run in the past 30 days. In 5 205 runners, single runs more than 10% longer than that raised the overuse-injury rate (HRR 1.64 for 10–30% longer, 2.28 for more than double) (Frandsen et al. 2025).
- Use long runs to practice race fueling and kit: the gut adapts to carbohydrate intake during exercise (Jeukendrup 2017).
Pacing and race prediction
| Event length | Best-supported pacing | Source |
|---|---|---|
| over ≈ 2 min (all road races) | even pace; for most runners an even or slightly negative split (second half equal or a little faster) | Abbiss & Laursen 2008 |
| very long (over ≈ 4 h, ultras) | trained athletes tend to slow progressively; start conservatively | Abbiss & Laursen 2008 |
| hills, wind | aim for even effort, not even pace; power meters help on the bike |
The first km of a race feels easy at any pace; going out 5% too fast costs more later than it gains.
Riegel formula
is a recent race time over distance ; is the predicted time for .
| Caveat | Detail | Source |
|---|---|---|
| fitted range | world records lasting about 3.5–230 min | Riegel 1981 |
| recreational runners | well calibrated up to the half-marathon; for the marathon it predicted at least 10 min too fast for half the runners | Vickers & Vertosick 2016, 2 303 runners |
| why | the prediction assumes you have trained for the longer distance; low weekly volume hurts the marathon most | Vickers & Vertosick 2016 |
Equivalent race times (Riegel, exponent 1.06)
| 5 k | 10 k | Half (21.1 km) | Marathon (42.2 km) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20:00 (4:00 /km) | 41:42 (4:10 /km) | 1:32:00 (4:22 /km) | 3:11:49 (4:33 /km) |
| 25:00 (5:00 /km) | 52:07 (5:13 /km) | 1:55:00 (5:27 /km) | 3:59:47 (5:41 /km) |
| 30:00 (6:00 /km) | 1:02:33 (6:15 /km) | 2:18:00 (6:32 /km) | 4:47:44 (6:49 /km) |
Treat the marathon column as a best case: for half of recreational runners the real time was at least 10 min slower (Vickers & Vertosick 2016), unless their training included long runs and high weekly volume.
Race fueling and hydration
Daily carbohydrate and recovery eating are in nutrition and hydration. This section covers the race itself.
Carbohydrate
| Race duration | Carbohydrate | Type | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| under 45 min | none needed | Thomas et al. 2016 | |
| 45–75 min | small amounts or a mouth rinse | any | Jeukendrup 2014; Thomas et al. 2016 |
| 1–2.5 h | 30–60 g/h | single source (glucose, maltodextrin) is fine | Thomas et al. 2016 |
| 2–3 h | up to ≈ 60 g/h | single source oxidised at up to ≈ 60 g/h | Jeukendrup 2014 |
| over 2.5–3 h | up to ≈ 90 g/h | multiple transportable carbohydrates (glucose + fructose, e.g. 2:1) | Jeukendrup 2014; Thomas et al. 2016 |
- The amounts are per hour, not per kg; lower them if you are running slowly (a lower absolute intensity burns less carbohydrate) (Jeukendrup 2014).
- High intakes need a trained gut: practice in long runs for weeks before the race (Jeukendrup 2017).
- Before the race: carbohydrate load 10–12 g/kg/day for 36–48 h before events over 90 min; eat 1–4 g/kg in the 1–4 h before the start (Thomas et al. 2016).
Fluid and sodium
| Point | Detail | Source |
|---|---|---|
| goal | avoid losing more than 2% of body mass, and never finish heavier than you started | ACSM (Sawka et al. 2007) |
| starting range | ≈ 0.4–0.8 L/h, then adjust to your sweat rate, heat and pace | ACSM (Sawka et al. 2007) |
| sweat rate | weigh before and after a 1 h run: 1 kg lost ≈ 1 L sweat, plus what you drank | ACSM (Sawka et al. 2007) |
| sodium | in events over 1 h, drinks with 0.5–0.7 g sodium per liter | Racinais et al. 2015 |
| hyponatraemia | the main cause is drinking too much; drink to thirst and don't gain weight during the race | Hew-Butler et al. 2015 |
| before | start euhydrated: 6 mL/kg every 2–3 h in the hours before exercise in the heat | Racinais et al. 2015 |
Heat and altitude
Heat
| Point | Detail | Source |
|---|---|---|
| acclimatisation | ≥ 60 min/day of exercise in the heat for 1–2 weeks (10–14 days); most adaptations come in the first week | Racinais et al. 2015 |
| what improves | lower heart rate and core temperature at the same pace, more and earlier sweating | Racinais et al. 2015 |
| decay | benefits fade over weeks; re-acclimatising is faster than the first time | Racinais et al. 2015 |
| dehydration | losing more than ≈ 2% of body mass impairs aerobic performance in the heat | Racinais et al. 2015 |
| pacing | slow down from the start on hot days; target effort or heart rate, not goal pace | |
| cooling | pre-cooling (cold drinks, ice vests) helps before hot races | Racinais et al. 2015 |
| Heat illness | Signs | What to do |
|---|---|---|
| heat exhaustion | tiredness, dizziness, headache, nausea or vomiting, heavy sweating, pale clammy skin, cramps, high temperature, fast pulse | stop; move somewhere cool; remove extra clothing; drink water or a sports drink; spray or sponge with cool water and fan. Should improve within 30 min |
| heatstroke (emergency) | very high temperature, hot skin that has stopped sweating, confusion or poor coordination, fast breathing, seizure, collapse | call emergency services; cool them while waiting |
From the NHS. Heatstroke can kill: if in doubt, treat it as heatstroke and get medical help.
Altitude
| Point | Detail | Source |
|---|---|---|
| performance loss | in endurance athletes, VO₂max fell 6.3% per 1 000 m (range 4.6–7.5%) from 300 m up to 2 800 m; time to exhaustion fell 14.5% per 1 000 m | Wehrlin & Hallén 2006 |
| from how high | measurable from 800 m | Wehrlin & Hallén 2006 |
| altitude camps | in a 4-week live-high, train-low camp, living at 2 000–2 500 m improved 3 000 m time; living at 1 780 m or 2 800 m did not | Chapman et al. 2014 |
| racing at altitude | pace by effort or heart rate; expect slower times the higher you go |
Cycling power and triathlon
Power zones (Coggan)
FTP (functional threshold power) is the highest power you could hold for about an hour. Common field test: 95% of your average power in an all-out 20 min effort after a thorough warm-up (Allen & Coggan). The 95% fits only about half of riders: the real ratio runs from about 86% (sprinters) to 96% (time triallists).
| Level | Name | % FTP | % threshold HR | Typical use |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | active recovery | 55 or less | 68 or less | easy spinning |
| 2 | endurance | 56–75 | 69–83 | long steady rides, conversation possible |
| 3 | tempo | 76–90 | 84–94 | brisk group ride, harder to talk |
| 4 | lactate threshold | 91–105 | 95–105 | time-trial effort, 2 × 20 min |
| 5 | VO₂max | 106–120 | 106 and up | 3–8 min intervals |
| 6 | anaerobic capacity | 121 and up | n/a | 30 s to 3 min efforts |
| 7 | neuromuscular power | n/a (maximal) | n/a | sprints of a few seconds |
Coggan's levels as published by TrainingPeaks.
Triathlon notes
| Topic | Guidance |
|---|---|
| brick session | a run straight after a bike ride; teaches running on tired legs. Start with 10–20 min easy off the bike |
| "jelly legs" | the first minutes off the bike feel awkward; shorter, quicker steps help |
| transitions | T1 swim to bike, T2 bike to run. Lay out kit in the order you need it and rehearse |
| fueling | eat and drink mostly on the bike: it is easier on the gut than running |
| pacing | an over-hard bike ruins the run; ride at a power or heart rate you have rehearsed |
Watch for how to structure a brick session and settle your cadence off the bike.
Injury risk, form and shoes
Load
| Risk factor | Evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|
| single-run spikes | a run over 10% longer than your longest in the past 30 days raised overuse-injury rate | Frandsen et al. 2025 |
| weekly jumps | novices who raised weekly distance over 30% in 2 weeks had more distance-related injuries (exploratory, not significant) | Nielsen et al. 2014 |
| ACWR (acute:chronic workload ratio) | contested: no causal evidence and statistical artifacts; in Frandsen's cohort, ACWR spikes were linked to fewer injuries | Impellizzeri et al. 2020; Frandsen et al. 2025 |
| the 10% weekly rule | folklore; see training plans for the trial data | |
| other | previous injury, sudden changes in surface or shoes, low energy availability (bone stress) |
Form
| Tweak | Evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|
| raise step rate 5–10% | reduced the load absorbed at the knee and hip at the same speed | Heiderscheit et al. 2011 |
| overstriding | a foot landing far ahead of the body usually goes with low cadence; a small cadence increase shortens the stride | Heiderscheit et al. 2011 |
| big gait overhauls | little evidence they prevent injury; change one thing at a time, gradually |
Watch for posture, landing under the body and cadence cues rather than forcing a particular foot strike.
Shoes
| Question | Evidence | Source |
|---|---|---|
| choose by pronation or cushioning? | impact forces and pronation have not been shown to predict injury; pick the shoe that feels most comfortable (the "comfort filter") | Nigg et al. 2015 |
| do carbon-plated "super shoes" help? | a prototype cut the energy cost of running by ≈ 4% in 18 high-calibre runners | Hoogkamer et al. 2018 |
| switching shoes | change gradually, like any other load change |
Strength and concurrent training
| Point | Detail | Source |
|---|---|---|
| does running hurt strength gains? | max strength and muscle growth: no; explosive strength: a little, more when lifting and running are in the same session | Schumann et al. 2022 |
| does lifting help runners? | yes; details and programming in strength training | |
| scheduling | hard runs and heavy lifts on the same days, ≥ 6 h apart; see training plans |
Recipes
Three key running sessions
One easy, one threshold and one VO₂max session. Paces use the 30 min time-trial method from energy systems or recent race times.
EASY (I-1 to I-2)
40–60 min conversational; finish with 4–6 × 20 s strides
HR ≈ 55–82% HRmax; you could speak in full sentences
THRESHOLD (I-3 to I-4)
15 min easy + drills
3 × 10 min at ≈ 1 h race pace (≈ 30 min TT pace), 2 min jog
10 min easy
Should feel "comfortably hard"; last rep no faster than the first
VO₂MAX (I-4 to I-5)
15 min easy + drills + 3 strides
5 × 3 min at ≈ 3–5 k race pace, 2–3 min jog
10 min easy
Stop if you can't hold pace on two repsWeekly templates: 5 k, 10 k, half-marathon
About 80% easy by time, two quality sessions, one long run. Lifting fits on quality days (see strength training).
5 k (4 runs) 10 k (5 runs) Half (5 runs)
Mon rest rest rest
Tue VO₂max: 5 × 3 min VO₂max: 5 × 3 min threshold: 3 × 10 min
Wed easy 30–40 min easy 40 min easy 40–50 min
Thu threshold: 3 × 8 min threshold: 3 × 10 min easy 40 min + strides
Fri rest easy 30 min rest
Sat easy 30 min + strides easy 40 min + strides easy 40 min
Sun long 60–75 min long 75–90 min long 90–120 min, last 20–30 min
at half pace in later weeksBuild long runs gradually: each within about 10% of the longest in the past 30 days. Taper and full 12-week plans are in training plans.
Marathon race-day fueling plan
For a 3:30–4:30 marathon. Amounts from Thomas et al. 2016 and Jeukendrup 2014; rehearse all of it in long runs.
Day -2 to -1 carbohydrate load 10–12 g/kg/day, low fiber, low fat
(70 kg: 700–840 g/day, e.g. rice, pasta, bread, juice)
Race morning 2–4 h before: 1–4 g/kg carbohydrate (70 kg: 70–280 g),
familiar food; optional caffeine 3 mg/kg ≈ 60 min before
Start sip to thirst; nothing new today
Every 20–30 min
one gel (check the label: often 20–30 g carbohydrate)
target 60 g/h; up to 90 g/h glucose + fructose if trained
Drink to thirst at aid stations, ≈ 0.4–0.8 L/h in mild weather;
sports drink or salt if sweating heavily
From 30 km keep taking gels even if you don't feel like it
Finish fluids with sodium, carbohydrate + protein mealKarvonen zones, worked
A 50-year-old with resting HR 60.
HRmax (Tanaka) = 208 − 0.7 × 50 = 173 bpm (220 − 50 = 170)
HRR = 173 − 60 = 113 bpm
Target = 60 + p × 113
60% HRR → 60 + 68 = 128 bpm easy (ACSM vigorous starts here)
70% HRR → 60 + 79 = 139 bpm upper easy
80% HRR → 60 + 90 = 150 bpm threshold region
90% HRR → 60 + 102 = 162 bpm VO₂max intervals
Formula error ≈ ±11 bpm: check against a measured HRmax
and how the pace feels (talk test).Sweat-rate test
Run this once in each season's weather, then plan race drinking from it (ACSM, Sawka et al. 2007).
- Pee, then weigh yourself nude before a 60 min run at race effort.
- Note everything you drink during the run (mL).
- Towel dry and weigh nude again straight after, before drinking or peeing.
- Sweat rate (L/h) = (mass before − mass after, in kg) + fluid drunk (L), all over hours run.
- Aim to replace enough to keep losses under 2% of body mass, never more than you lose.
Before 70.0 kg, after 69.1 kg, drank 0.4 L in 1 h
Sweat rate = (70.0 − 69.1) + 0.4 = 1.3 L/h
Loss = 0.9 kg = 1.3% of body mass: fine for 1 h
3.5–4 h marathon at 1.3 L/h: drink ≈ 0.9–1.0 L/h to stay under 2%References
- Olympiatoppen: intensity scale (OLT I-scale) (opens in a new tab): 5-zone %HRmax, lactate, RPE and breathing cues
- Seiler-Viken et al.: Contextualizing the Norwegian standardized intensity zone framework (Sci Rep 2025) (opens in a new tab): LT1 and LT2, 3- vs 5-zone models, %HRmax at thresholds
- Bok, Rakovac & Foster: The talk test, feeling scale and RPE (Sports Med 2022) (opens in a new tab): subjective intensity markers
- Garber et al.: ACSM position stand, quantity and quality of exercise (MSSE 2011) (opens in a new tab): intensity classes by %HRR, %HRmax and RPE
- Tanaka, Monahan & Seals: Age-predicted maximal heart rate revisited (JACC 2001) (opens in a new tab): 208 − 0.7 × age
- Nes et al.: Age-predicted maximal heart rate in healthy subjects, the HUNT fitness study (Scand J Med Sci Sports 2013) (opens in a new tab): error of age formulas
- Seiler: What is best practice for training intensity and duration distribution in endurance athletes? (IJSPP 2010) (opens in a new tab): polarised distribution
- Oliveira, Boppre & Fonseca: Polarized versus other training intensity distributions, meta-analysis (Sports Med 2024) (opens in a new tab): polarised vs pyramidal evidence
- Frandsen et al.: How much running is too much? (BJSM 2025) (opens in a new tab): single-session spikes and injury
- Nielsen et al.: Excessive progression in weekly running distance and running-related injuries (JOSPT 2014) (opens in a new tab): weekly progression
- Impellizzeri et al.: Acute:chronic workload ratio: conceptual issues and fundamental pitfalls (IJSPP 2020) (opens in a new tab): why ACWR is contested
- Abbiss & Laursen: Describing and understanding pacing strategies during athletic competition (Sports Med 2008) (opens in a new tab): pacing profiles
- Riegel: Athletic records and human endurance (American Scientist 69:285–290, 1981): the 1.06 power law
- Vickers & Vertosick: An empirical study of race times in recreational endurance runners (BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil 2016) (opens in a new tab): where Riegel fails
- Jeukendrup: A step toward personalized sports nutrition: carbohydrate intake during exercise (Sports Med 2014) (opens in a new tab): carbohydrate g/h by duration
- Jeukendrup: Training the gut for athletes (Sports Med 2017) (opens in a new tab): gut training
- Thomas, Erdman & Burke: ACSM/AND/DC Nutrition and Athletic Performance (MSSE 2016) (opens in a new tab): race and pre-race carbohydrate
- Sawka et al.: ACSM position stand, exercise and fluid replacement (MSSE 2007) (opens in a new tab): fluid targets and sweat rate
- Hew-Butler et al.: 3rd International Exercise-Associated Hyponatremia Consensus (BJSM 2015) (opens in a new tab): drink to thirst
- Racinais et al.: Consensus recommendations on training and competing in the heat (Sports Med 2015) (opens in a new tab): acclimatisation, hydration, sodium
- NHS: Heat exhaustion and heatstroke (opens in a new tab): signs and first aid
- Wehrlin & Hallén: Linear decrease in VO₂max and performance with increasing altitude (Eur J Appl Physiol 2006) (opens in a new tab): altitude losses
- Chapman et al.: Defining the "dose" of altitude training (J Appl Physiol 2014) (opens in a new tab): best living altitude
- TrainingPeaks: Power training levels (Coggan) (opens in a new tab): cycling power zones
- TrainingPeaks: The FTP test, physiology and new protocols (opens in a new tab): the 20 min test and its 95% factor
- Heiderscheit et al.: Effects of step rate manipulation on joint mechanics during running (MSSE 2011) (opens in a new tab): cadence and joint loading
- Nigg et al.: Running shoes and running injuries: mythbusting (BJSM 2015) (opens in a new tab): comfort filter
- Hoogkamer et al.: A comparison of the energetic cost of running in marathon racing shoes (Sports Med 2018) (opens in a new tab): the 4% shoe
- Schumann et al.: Compatibility of concurrent aerobic and strength training (Sports Med 2022) (opens in a new tab): interference effect


