../

Persuasive writing

Writing that gets a specific reader to decide, act or change their mind: rhetoric basics, answer-first structure (Minto), Amazon-style memos and PR/FAQs, decision docs, emails that get answered, cold outreach, pitches and one-liners, copywriting formulas, headlines, stories, evidence, calls to action and the line between persuasion and manipulation. Sentence-level craft is in clear writing; biases that persuasion exploits are in cognitive biases; YC's founder advice is in Y Combinator.

Rhetoric basics

Aristotle, Rhetoric (4th century BC, trans. W. Rhys Roberts): "Of the modes of persuasion furnished by the spoken word there are three kinds. The first kind depends on the personal character of the speaker; the second on putting the audience into a certain frame of mind; the third on the proof, or apparent proof, provided by the words of the speech itself."

AppealGreek senseOn the pageFails when
Ethoscharacter, credibilityrelevant track record, candour about weaknesses, accurate details, a named author who owns the recommendationcredentials are irrelevant or inflated; one wrong number destroys it
Pathosthe audience's state of mindthe reader's stakes, a concrete customer story, vivid consequencesit replaces evidence, or the emotion is manufactured
Logosthe argument itselfa clear claim, reasons, data, worked examples, the alternatives and why they losethe logic is sound but the reader doesn't care (no pathos) or doesn't trust you (no ethos)
Kairosthe opportune momentwhy now: a deadline, a market shift, a budget cycle, a recent incidentthe same proposal lands differently a quarter earlier or later

Aristotle adds that credibility "should be achieved by what the speaker says, not by what people think of his character before he begins to speak". On the page, ethos is built by precision: correct numbers, fair statement of the other side, and the specific detail only someone who has done the work would know.

Know the reader's decision

Persuasive writing starts from the reader's decision, not your content. Before drafting, answer these.

QuestionWhy it matters
Who decides?a document aimed at "the team" persuades nobody; name the decision-maker
What exactly are they deciding?"approve $40k for a pilot" is decidable; "think about AI" is not
What do they care about?revenue, risk, their team's time, their boss's goals, their reputation
What do they already believe?start from shared ground; don't argue what they already accept
What will make them say no?the objections you must answer in the document
What is the cost of saying yes?money, time, reversibility, political capital
What happens if they do nothing?the real alternative is usually the status quo, not a competitor
When do they need to decide?kairos; and your deadline, if you have one

Two rules follow:

  • One document, one ask. Two asks halve the chance of either. Split them.
  • Make the ask the easy path. Reduce the cost of saying yes: a pilot instead of a rollout, a reversible decision, a default that happens unless they object.

Answer first: the Pyramid Principle

Barbara Minto developed the Pyramid Principle at McKinsey in the 1960s–70s and published it as a book in the 1980s (her site dates the original book to 1987; the expanded The Minto Pyramid Principle appeared in 1996). Her summary: "your thinking will be easy for a reader to grasp if you present the ideas organized as a pyramid under a single point."

RuleMeaning
Answer firstthe governing thought (recommendation, conclusion) goes at the top
Summarize beloweach idea summarizes the group of ideas beneath it
Group logicallyideas in a group are the same kind of idea and are MECE (mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive, Minto's term)
Order logicallywithin a group: deductive (argument chain), chronological, structural or by importance
Vertical Q&Aeach statement raises a question in the reader's mind ("why?", "how?"); the level below answers it
            Recommendation: move billing to Stripe by Q1
          /                     |                       \
 Cuts cost 30%         Removes PCI scope        Unblocks EU launch
 - fees vs current     - no card data stored    - SEPA, VAT built in
 - fewer FTE hours     - audit shrinks          - 6 weeks vs 6 months

SCQ and SCQA introductions

Minto's introduction structure (her "SCQ Framework") tells a story the reader already agrees with, then raises the question the document answers.

PartContentExample
Situationuncontroversial context the reader accepts"We process 40,000 payments a month through our in-house billing system."
Complicationwhat changed or went wrong; creates tension"The EU launch needs SEPA and VAT handling, which would take six months to build, and our PCI audit costs $120k a year."
Questionthe question the complication raises (often implicit)"Should we keep building billing ourselves?"
Answerthe governing thought (top of the pyramid)"No: move to Stripe by Q1."

SCQA is the common name for the four-part version. For an impatient reader, reorder to A-SC: answer first, then the situation and complication that justify it.

The "so what?" test

For every statement, ask "so what?" until the answer is something the reader cares about. Consulting practice calls the result an insight as opposed to an observation.

ObservationSo what?Insight (write this)
"Churn rose to 4% in Q3."concentrated in accounts on the old plan"Customers on the legacy plan are leaving: migrating them would cut churn by half."
"The API has 120 endpoints."30 are unused"Deleting 30 unused endpoints halves our security review."
"Competitor X raised $50M."they will cut prices"Expect a price war in the mid-market by spring; lock in annual contracts now."

Memos and narratives

The Amazon six-pager

Jeff Bezos's email to Amazon's senior team on 9 June 2004 had the subject line "No powerpoint presentations from now on at steam". Its reasoning (as published by Business Insider in 2015):

The reason writing a 4 page memo is harder than "writing" a 20 page powerpoint is because the narrative structure of a good memo forces better thought and better understanding of what's more important than what, and how things are related.

In the 2017 shareholder letter: "We don't do PowerPoint (or any other slide-oriented) presentations at Amazon. Instead, we write narratively structured six-page memos. We silently read one at the beginning of each meeting in a kind of 'study hall.'" And on quality: "The great memos are written and re-written, shared with colleagues who are asked to improve the work, set aside for a couple of days, and then edited again with a fresh mind."

PracticeWhy
full sentences, no bullet lists for reasoningforces the logical connections bullets let you skip
silent reading at the start of the meetingeveryone has actually read it; no presenter charisma
appendices for datathe narrative stays at six pages; the evidence is available
comments in the doc, then discussionthe meeting is spent on disagreement, not comprehension
multiple drafts over daysquality comes from rewriting and outside review

PR/FAQ (working backwards)

Colin Bryar and Bill Carr, Working Backwards (2021), describe Amazon's PR/FAQ: write the launch press release and the FAQs before building anything, to force the author to start from the customer. Their published template's components:

PartContent
Headingname the product so the target customer understands it, one sentence
Subheadingwho the customer is and what benefit they get, one sentence
Summary paragraphcity, outlet, planned launch date; the product and its benefits
Problem paragraphthe customer's problem, from the customer's point of view
Solution paragraph(s)how the product solves it, and how it beats what customers use today
Quotes and getting starteda company spokesperson quote, a hypothetical customer quote, how to start
External FAQquestions customers and press will ask (price, how it works, returns)
Internal FAQquestions leadership will ask: market size, cost, risks, dependencies, what must be true

The press release is short (about a page); the FAQ carries the hard thinking. Bryar and Carr describe the review as 15–20 minutes of silent reading followed by discussion aimed at truth-seeking, not selling.

Proposals and decision docs

One-page proposal

A one-pager fits when the decision is modest and the reader is senior. The constraint is the point: if it does not fit on a page, you have not decided what matters.

SectionLength
Ask (BLUF)1–2 sentences: what, how much, by when
Problem2–4 sentences with one number
Proposalwhat you will do; scope and non-scope
Why this, why nowthe alternatives briefly; the timing argument
Cost and riskmoney, people, time; what could go wrong; how reversible
Success measurethe metric, target and check-in date

Decision doc

For contested or high-stakes decisions, lay out options fairly. A reader who spots a straw-man option stops trusting the whole document.

SectionContent
Decision neededthe question, the decider, the deadline
Contextfacts only, value-neutral; what constraints are fixed
Options2–4 real options, including "do nothing"
Comparisona table of options against the criteria that matter
Recommendationwhich option and why, stated plainly
Risks and mitigationsfor the recommended option; what would change your mind
Reversibilityone-way or two-way door; cost to undo
CriterionA: build in-houseB: StripeC: do nothing
time to EU launch6 months6 weeksblocked
annual cost$300k eng time0.4% of volume$120k audit
control of UXfullhighfull
reversibilityhighmedium (migration)n/a

Emails that get answered

The reader decides in the preview pane whether to act now, later or never. Write for that pane.

ElementRuleBeforeAfter
Subjectstate the action and deadline"Quick question""Approve Q4 contractor budget by Thu?"
First lineBLUF: the ask or the news"Hope you're well! I wanted to reach out regarding…""Can you approve $18k for two contractors in Q4?"
Bodyonly what the reader needs to decidea history of the projectthree lines: why, what, what if not
One askone question per emailfour questions in one paragraphone question; other topics in other emails
Deadlinea real date and the reason"when you get a chance""by Thursday, so they can start on the 1st"
Easy yesmake replying trivial"Thoughts?""Reply 'yes' and I'll send the contracts."
Lengthfits on a phone screen400 wordsunder 150 words

Full example.

BEFORE
Subject: Contractors
 
Hi Sam,
 
Hope you had a great weekend! I wanted to reach out about
the Q4 plan. As you know we've been discussing the mobile
app timeline for a while, and there have been some
challenges with hiring, which I think we talked about in
the last planning meeting. Anyway, the team has been
looking at options and we think it might make sense to
consider bringing in some contractors, potentially two,
though we could discuss. Budget would be roughly $18k I
think. Let me know your thoughts when you get a chance!
 
AFTER
Subject: Approve $18k for 2 contractors by Thu?
 
Hi Sam,
 
Can you approve $18k for two contract iOS developers for
October-December?
 
- Why: our open iOS role has been unfilled for 10 weeks;
  without help the app slips from November to February.
- What: two contractors from Acme, $9k each, vetted
  by Priya.
- Deadline: Thursday, so they can start on 1 October.
 
Reply "yes" and I'll send the contracts for signature.
 
Thanks,
Alex
SituationSubject line pattern
request"[Action] by [date]?" — "Review pricing page by Fri?"
FYI"FYI: [the news]" — "FYI: EU launch moved to 3 Nov"
decision made"Decision: [what]" — "Decision: we're moving billing to Stripe"
urgent"Urgent: [impact] — [ask]" — "Urgent: checkout down — need DB access"
intro"Intro: [A] ↔ [B] ([why])"

Cold outreach

Cold emails compete with hundreds of others. The formula is short, specific, easy yes.

Michael Seibel (YC), "How to Email Early Stage Investors": sentence one, "Clearly explain what you do"; sentence two, "Sell me on why I should be excited"; sentence three, "Ask for what you want". He adds: "Don't ask for a phone call or a meeting. Let me escalate things." His listed mistakes include "Writing too much. Walls of text result in slow/no replies."

PrincipleDetail
relevanceone line proving this is for them, not a mail-merge (their post, product, problem)
specificitynumbers and names; "3,000 teams" beats "fast-growing"
small aska question, feedback, a 15-minute call at most; not "partnership"
easy yesthe reply can be one word
no flattery paddingone genuine specific compliment at most; skip "I'm a huge fan"
follow up once or twiceshort, polite, adds something new; then stop
send from a real addresscompany domain; a real name
BeforeAfterWhy
"I'm the founder of an innovative AI-powered platform revolutionising workflows.""We built a tool that turns Zendesk tickets into Jira bugs automatically; 40 support teams use it."specific product, real traction
"Would love to pick your brain sometime!""Would you tell me whether you'd pay $20/seat for this? A one-word answer is plenty."small, answerable ask
"Let me know if you'd be open to hopping on a call to explore synergies.""If useful, I can send a 2-minute demo video. Want it?"easy yes, no calendar cost

Pitches and one-liners

Pitch structure

Sequoia's "Writing a Business Plan" outline, the standard skeleton for a pitch deck or narrative:

#SectionSequoia's prompt
1Company purpose"Define your company in a single declarative sentence."
2Problem"Describe the pain of your customer."
3Solution"Explain your eureka moment."
4Why now?"The best companies almost always have a clear why now?"
5Market potential"Identify your customer and your market."
6Competition / alternativesshow "that you have a plan to win"
7Business model"How do you intend to thrive?"
8Team"Tell the story of your founders and key team members."
9Financials"If you have any, please include."
10Vision"If all goes well, what will you have built in five years?"

Michael Seibel's "How to Pitch Your Company" reduces it to seven questions: what do you do; how big is the market; what's your progress; what's your unique insight; what's your business model; who's on your team; what do you want. His editing rule: "eliminate jargon, acronyms, marketing speak, and any ambiguous terms such as 'platform'", and "you don't need to sound cool. You need to be clear."

The compact narrative order for a written pitch: problem → solution → why now → traction → market → team → ask. Lead with traction if it is your strongest card.

The one-liner

Seibel's first answer is the model: start with the company name and what it does, e.g. "Socialcam is a mobile app that makes it easy to take videos and share them with friends and family." He adds: "There's no need to set up the problem, you can just get to the point."

[Company] helps [specific who] [do what outcome]
by [how / mechanism].
 
Examples
Acme helps Shopify stores recover abandoned carts
by texting shoppers a one-tap checkout link.
 
Ledgerly helps two-person accounting firms close
the month in a day by reconciling bank feeds
automatically.
TestPass
a smart outsider can repeat itSeibel's "Email Test": email two sentences to a friend and ask them to explain it back
no buzzwordsno "platform", "AI-powered", "revolutionise", "ecosystem"
the customer is specific"Shopify stores", not "businesses"
the outcome is concrete"recover abandoned carts", not "drive growth"

"X for Y" one-liners ("Twitch for cooking", an example from Seibel's own investor-email post) are fast when both halves are well known and the analogy transfers the right thing. They fail when X is obscure, when X's business model is the wrong one to imply, or when every competitor uses the same X. Follow the analogy with the plain version.

Copywriting formulas

Formulas are scaffolds for short persuasive copy: landing pages, ads, launch posts, cold emails.

FormulaStepsBest forExample
AIDAAttention → Interest → Desire → Actionads, landing pages"Still reconciling by hand? (A) Ledgerly matches 95% of bank lines automatically (I). Close the month in a day, not a week (D). Start free (A)."
PASProblem → Agitate → Solutionpain-driven products, cold email"Deploys take 40 minutes. Every one blocks the team and invites a hotfix-on-hotfix. Our cache cuts builds to 4."
BABBefore → After → Bridgeoutcome-driven products, case studies"Before: on-call pages at 3 a.m. After: the fix is a one-click rollback. Bridge: Canary runs every deploy against real traffic first."
4 UsUseful, Urgent, Unique, Ultra-specificheadlines, subject lines"Cut your AWS bill 30% before Q4 renewals (the 6 settings we changed)"
FABFeature → Advantage → Benefitproduct pages, sales copy"SSO (F) means no separate passwords (A), so offboarding takes one click and no one keeps access (B)."

AIDA's history is murkier than its usual attribution. It is generally credited to advertising pioneer E. St. Elmo Lewis around 1898, but an anonymous formula ("attract attention… interest and convince") appeared in Printers' Ink in 1898, the four-step version was elaborated by others in the 1900s, and the acronym itself appears in print around 1921. Reviews of hierarchy-of-effects models (e.g. Vakratsas and Ambler, 1999) find little evidence that buyers move through the steps in order. Treat it as a checklist, not a model of the mind.

The origins of PAS, BAB, FAB and the 4 Us are copywriting folklore; none has a reliable single inventor.

Headlines and titles

A title is a promise. It must be specific enough to select the right readers and honest enough that the body delivers.

LeverBeforeAfter
specificity"Improving our infrastructure""How we cut deploy time from 40 minutes to 4"
numbers"Some pricing lessons""7 pricing mistakes that cost us $200k"
reader benefit"Our new caching layer""Faster pages with no code changes"
the claim itself"Thoughts on remote work""Remote teams need more writing, not more meetings"
audience selection"A guide to Postgres""Postgres indexing for Rails developers"
question (sparingly)"Microservices discussion""Do you actually need microservices?"
CuriosityClickbait
withholds the answer but promises a specific onewithholds the answer and the body doesn't have one
"Why our fastest-growing feature had no marketing""You won't believe what happened next"
the reader is glad they clickedthe reader feels tricked and remembers your name for it

Storytelling in persuasion

Stories carry pathos and make logos memorable. In business writing a story is usually one customer, one moment, one change.

The story spine, created by improv teacher Kenn Adams and widely circulated through a list of Pixar storytelling tips:

Once upon a time...            (the world / the status quo)
Every day...                   (the routine)
But, one day...                (the event that breaks it)
Because of that...             (consequence)
Because of that...             (consequence)
Until, finally...              (the climax)
And, ever since then...        (the new normal)
 
Business version
Once upon a time, support teams copied tickets into Jira.
Every day, bugs were lost or duplicated.
One day, Maya's team missed a data-loss bug for a week.
Because of that, they lost their biggest customer.
Because of that, Maya built a script to sync tickets.
Until finally, every support team in the company used it.
And ever since, bugs reach engineering in minutes.
(Now it's a product. Here's what we're asking for...)
Story deviceUse
Before / After / Bridgeshow the reader's world now, the better world, then your product as the bridge
Customer storyone named (or anonymised but specific) customer with a real number
Anecdote + datathe story makes it vivid; the data proves it isn't a one-off
Founder storyonly when it explains the unique insight; not biography
Contrast"Most teams do X. We found Y."

Evidence and objections

Evidence

TypeStrengthRisk
data you measuredstrong, specificcherry-picking; show the baseline and the denominator
experiment / A/B teststrongest for causal claimsunderpowered tests; state sample size
customer quotevivid, credibleunrepresentative; say how many said similar
case studyconcrete proof it works somewheresurvivorship; mention failures
expert or authorityborrows credibilityirrelevant authority; appeal-to-authority fallacy
social proof (logos, user counts)reduces perceived riskvanity metrics; readers check
analogymakes the unfamiliar familiarproves nothing; the analogy may break exactly where it matters

Rules: give the number, the baseline and the source; round sensibly; prefer one strong piece of evidence over five weak ones; never state a figure you cannot defend in the meeting.

Robert Cialdini's principles of influence (reciprocity, commitment and consistency, social proof, authority, liking, scarcity, and later unity) describe real shortcuts readers use. See cognitive biases. Use them to present true things well, never to fabricate urgency or consensus.

Handling objections

Answer the strongest objection in the document before the reader raises it. Unanswered objections become the meeting.

TechniqueHowExample
pre-emptraise it yourself, then answer it"The obvious worry is lock-in. Our data export runs nightly to S3, so switching costs a week."
concede and countergrant what is true, then show why it doesn't decide the question"Yes, Stripe costs more per transaction. It still saves $180k a year in audit and engineering."
steelmanstate the other side at its strongest"The best case for building in-house is control over checkout UX…"
reframe the comparisoncompare to the real alternative, often the status quo"The choice isn't Stripe vs perfect; it's Stripe vs a six-month delay."
reduce the stakesmake it a pilot or a reversible step"Let's run it for one region for 60 days."
FAQ sectionlist and answer expected questionsthe Amazon internal FAQ

Calls to action

RuleBeforeAfter
one action"Sign up, follow us, and read our blog""Start your free trial"
a verb plus the outcome"Submit""Get my report"
specific commitment"Let's chat sometime""Book a 15-minute call this week"
deadline with a reason"Reply soon""Reply by Friday; the pricing changes on the 1st"
lower the cost"Buy now""Try free for 14 days, no card"
say what happens next"Contact sales""Get a quote within one business day"

In internal documents the call to action is the decision requested: "I recommend option B and need your approval by 30 September to hit the Q1 launch."

Writing for skimmers

Jakob Nielsen's "How Users Read on the Web" (NN/g, 1997) found that "79 percent of our test users always scanned any new page they came across; only 16 percent read word-by-word." Most business readers skim email and docs the same way.

TechniqueWhy
BLUF in the first two linesskimmers read the start and leave
descriptive headings that state claims"Stripe saves $180k a year" beats "Cost analysis"
bold the key phrase, not whole sentencesbold everything and nothing stands out
short paragraphs, one idea eacheach paragraph is an entry point
tables for comparisonsoptions × criteria is the natural shape of a decision
numbered lists for sequences and counts"three reasons" sets expectations
front-load sentences and list itemsthe first two words carry the scan
a summary box or TL;DRthe reader who reads nothing else gets the point

Persuasive essays and posts

Paul Graham's essays (see Y Combinator) are a model of informal persuasion: plain words, a conversational voice, one idea pushed hard. In "How to Write Usefully" (2020) he argues an essay should aim to be useful rather than merely persuasive: "Useful writing tells people something true and important that they didn't already know, and tells them as unequivocally as possible." He adds: "Useful writing makes claims that are as strong as they can be made without becoming false."

PartJob
Titlethe claim or the question, specific
Hook (first paragraph)the surprising claim, a concrete scene or the question the reader already has
Thesisone sentence the whole piece defends
Body3–5 reasons or steps, each with evidence or an example; counterarguments addressed
Turnthe objection a thoughtful reader would raise, answered
Conclusionwhat follows: the implication, the action, the new question; not a summary

Persuasion vs manipulation

The line: persuasion helps the reader make a decision they would endorse with full information; manipulation gets a decision they would reject if they saw how it was produced.

PersuasionManipulation
true evidence, selected fairlycherry-picked or invented numbers
real deadlines with reasonsfake scarcity and countdown timers
states the downsides and riskshides them in fine print
the reader's interest aligns with the askexploits a bias against the reader's interest
you would be comfortable if the reader saw your draft notesyou would not

Besides ethics, manipulation is bad strategy for anyone who writes to the same readers twice: ethos is the appeal that compounds.

Common mistakes

MistakeFix
writing about your content, not the reader's decisionstart from "who decides what, by when"
burying the askfirst line, and repeat it at the end
several asks in one documentone ask; split the rest
background before the pointanswer first, then SCQ
straw-man alternativesinclude the strongest alternative and "do nothing"
ignoring the obvious objectionpre-empt it in the text or the FAQ
adjectives instead of evidence"fast" → the number, the baseline, the source
buzzwords in pitchesSeibel's email test: a smart friend must be able to repeat it
bullet lists instead of reasoningnarrative prose for arguments; tables for data
clickbait titlesthe title's promise must be kept by the body
manufactured urgencya real deadline and its reason, or none
sending the first draftwrite, wait, get a reviewer, rewrite

Templates

Six-page narrative memo

Title: [Recommendation as a sentence]
Author / date / decision needed by: [..]
 
1. Summary (1 paragraph)
   What we propose, why, what it costs, what we need.
2. Context
   Situation the reader agrees with. Key numbers.
3. Problem / opportunity
   The complication. Why it matters now (kairos).
4. Proposal
   What we will do; scope and non-goals; milestones.
5. Alternatives considered
   Each option, why it loses. Include "do nothing".
6. Risks and mitigations
   What could go wrong; what would change our mind.
7. Cost and resourcing
   People, money, time; reversibility.
8. Success metrics
   Metric, baseline, target, review date.
9. Ask
   The specific decision or resources requested.
 
Appendix: data, detailed financials, FAQ.
Rules: full sentences; no slides; <= 6 pages + appendix.

PR/FAQ

HEADING: [Product name] [does what] for [whom]
SUBHEADING: [Customer] can now [benefit] - [one sentence]
 
[CITY] - [Launch date] - [Company] today announced
[product], which [summary of benefit].
 
PROBLEM: Today, [customer] [struggles with X]. [Why it
hurts, in the customer's words.]
 
SOLUTION: [Product] [how it solves X]. Unlike [current
alternatives], it [key difference].
 
"[Why we built it]," said [spokesperson, title].
 
"[Specific benefit in plain words]," said [customer].
 
GETTING STARTED: [How to start in one or two sentences.]
 
EXTERNAL FAQ
Q: How much does it cost?
Q: How does it work?
Q: What if [common concern]?
 
INTERNAL FAQ
Q: How big is the market and how do we know?
Q: What does it cost to build and run?
Q: What are the biggest risks?
Q: What has to be true for this to succeed?
Q: Why us, why now?

Decision doc

DECISION: [Question] - Decider: [name] - By: [date]
 
CONTEXT (facts only)
[..]
 
OPTIONS
A. [..]   B. [..]   C. Do nothing
 
| Criterion | A | B | C |
| ...       |   |   |   |
 
RECOMMENDATION
[Option], because [top 2-3 reasons].
 
RISKS / WHAT WOULD CHANGE MY MIND
[..]
 
REVERSIBILITY
[One-way or two-way door; cost to undo]

Request email

Subject: [Action] by [date]?
 
Hi [Name],
 
Can you [specific ask] by [date]?
 
- Why: [one line, with a number]
- What: [one line: scope, cost]
- If not: [consequence or alternative]
 
Reply "[yes]" and I'll [next step].
 
[Name]

Cold email

Subject: [Specific, relevant, short]
 
Hi [Name],
 
[One line showing why you're writing to *them*.]
 
[What you do, one sentence, no jargon.]
[Why it's interesting: best traction or insight.]
 
[Small, specific ask with an easy yes.]
 
[Name], [role], [company domain]
 
Follow-up (5-7 days later, same thread):
"Hi [Name], quick bump - [one new fact]. Worth a look?"

Pitch narrative

ONE-LINER  [Company] helps [who] [outcome] by [how].
PROBLEM    [Who] [pain], costing [number]. Today they
           [workaround], which fails because [..].
SOLUTION   [What it does]. [The insight others miss].
WHY NOW    [Shift: tech, regulation, behavior, cost].
TRACTION   [Users/revenue/growth rate, time period].
MARKET     [Bottom-up: # customers x price].
COMPETITION [Alternatives and why we win].
MODEL      [Who pays, how much, how often].
TEAM       [Founders; the one relevant credential].
ASK        [Amount, what it buys, milestones].

Landing page (AIDA)

HEADLINE (Attention)   [Outcome] for [who] [in time/cost]
SUBHEAD (Interest)     [How it works, one sentence]
PROOF (Desire)         [Number] [customer logos] [quote]
BENEFITS (Desire)      3 x [feature -> benefit]
OBJECTION              [Top worry] - [answer]
CTA (Action)           [Verb + outcome] [risk reducer]

References